Lookalike domains and registrations
Coverage areas
Domains, social, app stores (scoped to your program)
Delivery
Platform workflows + optional managed services
Outputs
Prioritized queues, evidence, takedown tracking
Coverage
Threat patterns programs typically monitor
Programs are tuned to your marks and channels; the list below reflects common categories teams prioritize.
Web impersonation & lookalike hosts
Domains and pages that mimic your login, checkout, or support experiences-prioritized by live content and customer impact.
Brand misuse in social & marketplaces
Impostor profiles, scam storefronts, and misleading listings that borrow your name, marks, or creative assets.
Mobile abuse surfaces
Suspicious or misleading app listings that could confuse users alongside your legitimate mobile footprint.
Scam campaigns & lures
Promotions, giveaways, and messaging that funnel victims toward fraud-often crossing email, web, and social.
Executive & VIP impersonation
Personas and channels pretending to be leadership or finance personas to pressure employees or partners.
Operational evidence & takedowns
Repeatable documentation and status tracking for hosts, registrars, and platforms so actions are defensible and auditable.
From noisy candidates to enforceable cases
Short blocks for the core workflow, FAQs and guides cover pilots, false-positive discipline, and handoffs to phishing programs.
Generation and live risk are different questions
Candidates show what could exist; DNS, certificates, MX, content, and redirects show what is dangerous now. Good scoring separates parking and investor noise from active impersonation tied to your login and payment paths.
A queue analysts actually trust
The goal is not the longest list, it is the shortest list your team can act on with complete evidence. Tune thresholds tighter around auth and payment surfaces; link clusters and repeat kits so priority rises naturally.
Registrar-ready evidence, one timeline
Stable identifiers, timestamps, captures where appropriate, and a clear customer-confusion narrative beat vague complaints. When hostnames rotate or kits reuse, related findings stay on one campaign timeline instead of starting from zero.
Suspension is not always the end
Track recycle behavior and time-to-return across permutations and hosts. Leadership should see sustained defense, not one-off wins that ignore the next registration wave.
Who this is for
Security and fraud teams protecting auth surfaces, brand and legal teams managing trademark portfolios, and organizations where lookalike domains precede phishing spikes. Also buyers comparing vendors on false-positive discipline and registrar-ready exports.
Protect revenue and customer trust
See how PhishEye centralizes detections, evidence, and takedowns so security, fraud, and brand teams share one operational picture.
FAQs
Common questions
What is typosquatting in simple terms?
How does PhishEye reduce false positives?
Does typosquat monitoring replace certificate monitoring?
How do typo domains connect to active phishing?
Explore further
Related pages
Ready to scope a program for your marks and channels?